NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro 5010M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 756 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 31.26 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 1,000 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 93% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 vs 315
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2792 vs 1772
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 vs 315 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2792 vs 1772 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16261 vs 8001
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 vs 8001 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 | 315 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2792 | 1772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8001 | 16261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GF110 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 565 | 568 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $235.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 977 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 83.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |