NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 756 MHz
• Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 977 MHz
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 2803
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20661 vs 7907
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 3854
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 3854

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 323
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 2803
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20661 7907
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3358

Compare specifications (specs)