NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 756 MHz
Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 977 MHz
2.5x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 2792
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20720 vs 8001
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 3854
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 3854

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1493 MHz vs 756 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 977 MHz
Texture fill rate	77.76 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2,488 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5919 vs 2792
Geekbench - OpenCL	20720 vs 8001
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496 vs 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496 vs 3854

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 vs 323
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3687
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3687
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	417 vs 323
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5919

2792

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

323

417

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

20720

8001

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8496

3854

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8496

3854

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3358

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	5919	2792
PassMark - G2D Mark	323	417
Geekbench - OpenCL	20720	8001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496	3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496	3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2340

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP106B	GM107
Launch date	1 February 2017	11 January 2017
Place in performance rating	564	565
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	977 MHz
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	756 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,488 gflops	1,000 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	512
Texture fill rate	77.76 GTexel / s	31.26 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	4,400 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB / s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection