NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 vs 412
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2749
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2749
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3093
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3093

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 18 August 2015
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	417 vs 412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3093

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Around 29% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 756 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1013 MHz vs 977 MHz
2.5x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 512
2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6149 vs 2792
2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19892 vs 8001
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 vs 3854
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 vs 3854

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	975 MHz vs 756 MHz
Boost clock speed	1013 MHz vs 977 MHz
Texture fill rate	78 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1,280 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2,496 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6149 vs 2792
Geekbench - OpenCL	19892 vs 8001
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7602 vs 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7602 vs 3854

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

417

412

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2792

6149

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8001

19892

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3854

7602

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3854

7602

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

2749

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

2749

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3093

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3093

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
PassMark - G2D Mark	417	412
PassMark - G3D Mark	2792	6149
Geekbench - OpenCL	8001	19892
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3854	7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3854	7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	2749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		251.464
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM107	GM204
Launch date	11 January 2017	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	565	566
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	977 MHz	1013 MHz
Core clock speed	756 MHz	975 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,000 gflops	2,496 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	1,280
Texture fill rate	31.26 GTexel / s	78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	5,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	160 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus