NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 31 January 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3699 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
- Around 51% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 5923
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 5923
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 5923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 5923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 7988 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 31 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 539 | 536 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |