NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 667 MHz
• Around 94% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 771 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 150 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 148.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
• Around 88% better floating-point performance: 3,553 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5923 5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5923 5946

Compare specifications (specs)