NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 94% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 771 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 667 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 148.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 3,553 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 148.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,553 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5946 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5946 vs 5923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 5946 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6104 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.147 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP107 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 539 | 541 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,699.74 | |
| Price now | $523.66 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 3,553 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 148.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950
