NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 706 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3680
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 17 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 vs 5923
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 vs 5923
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 vs 5923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 vs 5923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 6288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 6288 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3987 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 17 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 525 | 669 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,950 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |