NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1093 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2645
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2645
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5923 vs 4941
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5923 vs 4941
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1093 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,399 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 vs 4941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 vs 4941 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 47 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 4941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 4941 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 525 | 759 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1093 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,399 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
