NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1098 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5923 vs 4920
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5923 vs 4920
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 3 December 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1098 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 vs 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 vs 4920 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 4920 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 3 December 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 525 | 700 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1098 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
