NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1201 MHz
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 3676
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 55.077
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 225.985
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2678
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2678
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 10 November 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1201 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 vs 3676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 vs 55.077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 vs 830.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 vs 225.985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 2678 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 590
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17696 vs 15667
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.132 vs 4.039
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 65.117
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17696 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 vs 65.117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 3676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 634 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 17696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 55.077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 830.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 4.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 82.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 225.985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 2678 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Baffin |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 10 November 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 517 | 596 |
Price now | $319.99 | $259.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | 19.63 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1201 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,460 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |