NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 55.04 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,761 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 3885
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 567
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 47.041
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 6173
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 6173
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 1312
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 5 March 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,761 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 vs 3885 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 567 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 vs 47.041 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 3696 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 vs 1312 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7850
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 vs 832.248
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.41 vs 4.039
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 vs 65.117
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 vs 245.081
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 vs 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 vs 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 vs 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 vs 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 3885 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 567 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 72.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 1312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 5 March 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 517 | 520 |
| Price now | $319.99 | $449.59 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | 11.01 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 210 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850A
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
