NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Tesla K40c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 595 vs 325
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 61.566
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 8 October 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 595 vs 325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 vs 61.566 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c
- 3x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 2880 vs 512
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4495 vs 4464
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17468 vs 15667
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1779.043 vs 832.248
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.463 vs 4.039
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 103.169 vs 65.117
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 308.261 vs 245.081
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 vs 4464 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17468 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 vs 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.463 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 vs 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.261 vs 245.081 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40c
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Tesla K40c |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4464 | 4495 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 595 | 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 17468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 61.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1779.043 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 6.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 103.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 308.261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Tesla K40c | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK110B |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $7,699 |
Place in performance rating | 532 | 533 |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 4,291 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 178.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |