NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 56.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4475 vs 79
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 592 vs 308
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4475 vs 79 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 vs 308 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 47 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 47 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4475 | 79 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 308 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP107 | C78 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
Place in performance rating | 526 | 529 |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |