NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 63.74

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950

• Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 3.5x more pipelines: 1792 vs 512
• Around 51% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 15667
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 vs 832.248
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 vs 4.039
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 vs 65.117
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 245.081
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 6796
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 6796
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1914 vs 1591

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 82144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 63.74
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 1177.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 69.23
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 343.81
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 7988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 7988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 1914

Compare specifications (specs)