NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 63.74
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 31 January 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 vs 63.74 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 3699 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1792 vs 512
- Around 51% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 15667
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 vs 832.248
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 vs 4.039
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 vs 65.117
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 245.081
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 6796
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 6796
- Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1914 vs 1591
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 vs 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 vs 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 vs 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 vs 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 vs 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 vs 1591 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4475 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 82144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 31 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $449 |
| Place in performance rating | 526 | 528 |
| Price now | $319.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
