NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
• 5970x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
• 6.7x more pipelines: 1280 vs 192
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
• 5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 1 GB
• 9.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 947
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 303
• 8.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 3879
• 11.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 10.229
• 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 258.26
• 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 0.885
• 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 13.688
• 26.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 19.02
• 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 1600
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1682
• 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 1600
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1682

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 1676
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 2668

Compare specifications (specs)