NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 723 MHz
• 1290.3x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 3851
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 487
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 22044
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 64.199
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1284.053
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 5.881
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 78.169
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 312.822
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 6508
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 6508

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X

• Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3717
• 14.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 1676
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3717
• 14.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 3851
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 24690

Compare specifications (specs)