NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P2200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1075 MHz
678.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 854
Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1722.98
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 37.16
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 10471
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3695
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 10471
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3695

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 June 2019 vs 2 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	918 vs 854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1958.592 vs 1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742 vs 37.16
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437 vs 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437 vs 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3695

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

2.2x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1280
Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13811 vs 9324
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37788 vs 31480
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 121.124
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 8.452
Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 510.941
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 1676
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 1676
Around 69% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5757 vs 3404

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2816 vs 1280
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	13811 vs 9324
Geekbench - OpenCL	37788 vs 31480
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843 vs 121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661 vs 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464 vs 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3338 vs 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3338 vs 1676
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5757 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9324

13811

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

918

854

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

31480

37788

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.124

145.843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1958.592

1722.98

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.452

11.661

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.742

37.16

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

510.941

788.464

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3338

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3338

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3404

5757

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	9324	13811
PassMark - G2D Mark	918	854
Geekbench - OpenCL	31480	37788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	121.124	145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1958.592	1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.452	11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742	37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	510.941	788.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1676	3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1676	3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3404	5757

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GP106	GM200
Launch date	10 June 2019	2 June 2015
Place in performance rating	304	297
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$649
Price now		$679.99
Value for money (0-100)		23.43
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1075 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	119.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	59.72 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.822 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2816
Pixel fill rate	59.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s	176 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	4400 million	8,000 million
CUDA cores		2816
Floating-point performance		6,060 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm (7.9")	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin + 8-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		600 Watt
SLI options		4x
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width	160 bit	384 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		7.0 GB/s
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround