NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• 678.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 852
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1722.98
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 37.16
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 10471
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3695
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 10471
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3695
• 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 1321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

• 2.2x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1280
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 9372
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 32343
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 121.124
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 8.452
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 510.941
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 1676
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 13758
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 852
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 42988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 788.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 1321

Compare specifications (specs)