NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 165.8 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 1,882 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 4551
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 2 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops vs 1,882 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3714
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3358
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3714
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11603 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 806 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 17482 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 2 September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
| Place in performance rating | 277 | 279 |
| Price now | $799.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 1,882 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 896 |
| Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 183 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
