NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 875.8x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56602 vs 42289
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 152.325
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1590.392
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 11.365
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 45.977
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 vs 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 45.977 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.1x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11603 vs 9903
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 806 vs 488
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 729.947
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 12750
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 12750
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11603 vs 9903 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 806 vs 488 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 vs 729.947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 12750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 12750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 | 11603 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 806 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 | 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
Place in performance rating | 274 | 277 |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
Price now | $799.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7604 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |