NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 760.4x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 150.103
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 vs 27.417
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 vs 27.417 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55525 vs 42289
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 1590.392
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 11.365
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 751.626
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 15267
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3714
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3358
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 15267
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3714
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3358
- Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 vs 4904
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
| Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops vs 5,304 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55525 vs 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 vs 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 vs 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 vs 4904 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11627 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 811 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 55525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 | 7241 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 15 August 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | $499.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 287 | 288 |
| Price now | $799.99 | $439.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | 43.70 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 9,068 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
| Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
