NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs ATI FirePro RG220
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and ATI FirePro RG220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 41.5x more texture fill rate: 165.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 22.4x more pipelines: 1792 vs 80
- 66.3x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 34.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 335
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 552
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 1 May 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops vs 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 vs 335 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 552 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro RG220
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: ATI FirePro RG220
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | ATI FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 335 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 552 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | ATI FirePro RG220 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP104 | RV711 |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 1 May 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
| Place in performance rating | 287 | 286 |
| Price now | $799.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DMS-59 |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
