NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 947 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 6.1x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11577 vs 8567
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 801 vs 757
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 117.322
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 11.12
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 628.757
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 8729
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 8729

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X

• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 176.0 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
• Around 57% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1792
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 5,632 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43410 vs 42289
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 vs 1590.392
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 vs 45.977
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3714
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3714
• 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3932 vs 1111

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11577 8567
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	801 757
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	42289 43410
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.325 117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1590.392 2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.365 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.977 120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	751.626 628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15267 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15267 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1111 3932

Compare specifications (specs)