NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2091 vs 1042
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7960 vs 4592
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 1397
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 1397
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 878
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 878
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2295 vs 2227
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2295 vs 2227
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2091 vs 1042 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7960 vs 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 vs 2227 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- 120x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 1800 million
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 237
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 1800 million |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 237 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 241 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2091 | 1042 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7960 | 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 2227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P520 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | GP108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 758 | 1380 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P520 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
NVIDIAQuadro P520 vs
NVIDIAT600
