NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA GRID K520

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P520

NVIDIA GRID K520

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 745 MHz
11.4x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 160

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 745 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s vs 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	240 vs 160

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520

8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
8x lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 1800 million
4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 2098
Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 7880
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 3527
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 3527
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3566
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3566
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2295
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2295

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2x 1536 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 1800 million
Maximum memory size	2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3516 vs 2098
Geekbench - OpenCL	10864 vs 7880
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6782 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6782 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

240

160

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2098

3516

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7880

10864

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

6782

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

6782

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3354

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA GRID K520
PassMark - G2D Mark	240	160
PassMark - G3D Mark	2098	3516
Geekbench - OpenCL	7880	10864
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	3354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		20.97
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1063.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.244
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		42.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		76.158

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA GRID K520
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP108	GK104
Launch date	27 May 2019	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	761	763
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,599
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	2x 1536
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s	2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million	225 Watt
Floating-point performance		2x 2,448 gflops
Transistor count		3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2x 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s	2x 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor