NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1188 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3716
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3358
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3716
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 1 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1188 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 2304 vs 512
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9309 vs 3575
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9309 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 1,490 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 vs 3575 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3625 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 9309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 9309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 1 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 578 | 403 |
Price now | $176.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | 5,728 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |