NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
• Around 45% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 6x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3625 vs 3176
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 362
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 11024
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 26.055
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 2.99
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 41.654
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 89.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 773.248
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3881
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 6631
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3881
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 6631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3625 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	559 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 9064

Compare specifications (specs)