NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD Radeon HD 7870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro P620

AMD Radeon HD 7870M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Around 46% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3625 vs 1507
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 556
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 1367
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3359
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 1367
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 February 2018 vs 24 April 2012
Core clock speed	1266 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate	46.56 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 45 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3625 vs 1507
PassMark - G2D Mark	559 vs 556
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3881 vs 1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6631 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3881 vs 1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6631 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870M

Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512

Pipelines	640 vs 512

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3625

1507

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

559

556

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3881

1367

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6631

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3881

1367

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6631

3359

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P620	AMD Radeon HD 7870M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3625	1507
PassMark - G2D Mark	559	556
Geekbench - OpenCL	12475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	43.877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	773.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.425
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	184.343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3881	1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6631	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3881	1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6631	3359

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P620	AMD Radeon HD 7870M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Code name	GP107	Heathrow
Launch date	1 February 2018	24 April 2012
Place in performance rating	578	575
Price now	$176.99
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	25.53
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1354 MHz
Core clock speed	1266 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops	1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	640
Texture fill rate	46.56 GTexel / s	32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	1,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.19 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0