NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.258 vs 171.616
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 232.258 vs 171.616

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13903 vs 9402
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 764 vs 538
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68161 vs 60788
  • Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 2031.301
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.925 vs 16.334
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 89.321
  • Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 627.854
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 10970
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3694
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3355
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 10970
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3694
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3355
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13903 vs 9402
PassMark - G2D Mark 764 vs 538
Geekbench - OpenCL 68161 vs 60788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404 vs 2031.301
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925 vs 16.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788 vs 89.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863 vs 627.854
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13044 vs 10970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13044 vs 10970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9402
13903
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
538
764
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
60788
68161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
232.258
171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2031.301
4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.334
16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
89.321
247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
627.854
1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10970
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3694
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10970
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3694
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
30936
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 9402 13903
PassMark - G2D Mark 538 764
Geekbench - OpenCL 60788 68161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 232.258 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2031.301 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.334 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 89.321 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 627.854 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10970 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3694 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10970 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3694 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 30936

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU106 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 96 10
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1215 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304
Pixel fill rate 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz