NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 911.5x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 41155
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 vs 157.231
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2046.214 vs 1722.566
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 vs 12.245
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.532 vs 38.225
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 645.647 vs 518.554
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10140 vs 9834
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10140 vs 9834
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 17 March 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 41155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 vs 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 vs 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 vs 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 vs 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 vs 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 vs 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 vs 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12868 vs 8351
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 834 vs 337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12868 vs 8351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 834 vs 337 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8351 | 12868 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | 834 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | 41155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 17 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 334 | 332 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $1,999.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | 192 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 8,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A370M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
