NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 646.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 2094
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 2094
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 2391
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 April 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 2391 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 503
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 11021
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 63723
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3361
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 945 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 503 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 vs 11021 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68096 vs 63723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 | 882 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11021 | 12297 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63723 | 68096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 8455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.3 |
Code name | N19E-Q1 | Greenland |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 247 | 244 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599.99 | |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | Large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |