NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 646.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 2094
  • 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 2094
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 2391
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 2391
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 1 April 2017
Boost clock speed 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 vs 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 vs 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 2391

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 503
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 11021
  • Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 63723
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3361
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3361
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 945 MHz
Pipelines 4096 vs 2304
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 882 vs 503
PassMark - G3D Mark 12297 vs 11021
Geekbench - OpenCL 68096 vs 63723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8455 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8455 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
503
882
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11021
12297
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
63723
68096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
2391
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
8455
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
8455
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G2D Mark 503 882
PassMark - G3D Mark 11021 12297
Geekbench - OpenCL 63723 68096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 8455
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 8455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 205.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3986.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1291.445

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon RX Vega

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 1.3
Code name N19E-Q1 Greenland
Launch date 27 May 2019 1 April 2017
Place in performance rating 247 244
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $599.99
Price now $409.99
Value for money (0-100) 38.94

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 4096
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 307.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million
Floating-point performance 9,830 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 512 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 2048 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready