NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1114 MHz
928.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
2.1x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64495 vs 37354
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 13738
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 13738

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 21 March 2015
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	64495 vs 37354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Around 5% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 738 vs 523
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11763 vs 11185

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	988 MHz vs 945 MHz
Pipelines	3072 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	738 vs 523
PassMark - G3D Mark	11763 vs 11185

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

523

738

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11185

11763

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64495

37354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

13738

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

13738

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3356

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro M6000
PassMark - G2D Mark	523	738
PassMark - G3D Mark	11185	11763
Geekbench - OpenCL	64495	37354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		768.171

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	N19E-Q1	GM200
Launch date	27 May 2019	21 March 2015
Place in performance rating	231	244
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,199.99
Price now		$2,825
Value for money (0-100)		4.69
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1114 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	3072
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	8,000 million
Floating-point performance		6,844 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready