NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 13044
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 13044
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 566
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 12794
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3716
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3716
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3359
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3359
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69812 vs 68858
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 566 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 12794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 vs 68858 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 815 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 13932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 30936 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 69812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 181 | 118 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
