NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
28x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12569 vs 8183
Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 10141
Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 10141
Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71259 vs 56040

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 26 April 2016
Boost clock speed	1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	12569 vs 8183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18169 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18169 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3713
Geekbench - OpenCL	71259 vs 56040

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

3.2x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2560
Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 vs 533
11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3359
11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2x 4096 vs 2560
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	780 vs 533
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	38251 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	38251 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

533

780

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12569

8183

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18169

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18169

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

38251

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

38251

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

71259

56040

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G2D Mark	533	780
PassMark - G3D Mark	12569	8183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18169	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18169	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	38251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	38251
Geekbench - OpenCL	71259	56040
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		799.933
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Code name	N19E-Q3 MAX-Q	Capsaicin
Launch date	27 May 2019	26 April 2016
Place in performance rating	194	192
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Design		reference
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,499
Price now		$849
Value for money (0-100)		17.05
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 - 1485 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	780 - 960 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2560	2x 4096
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	350 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	8,900 million
Compute units		128
Floating-point performance		2x 8,192 gflops
Texture fill rate		2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
DisplayPort support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	3x 8-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		277 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	DirectX® 12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	2x 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Memory bandwidth		512 GB / s
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
Enduro
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
ZeroCore