NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 566
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 12794
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 18169
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 18169
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 vs 68858
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 566 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 12794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 18169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 vs 68858 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 869 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 19370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 137262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU102 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 181 | 103 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |