NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3290
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3290
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Boost clock speed 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 566
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 12794
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 18169
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 18169
  • Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 vs 68858
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1005 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 vs 566
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 vs 12794
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578 vs 18169
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578 vs 18169
Geekbench - OpenCL 137262 vs 68858

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
566
869
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12794
19370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18169
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18169
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3290
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
68858
137262
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 869
PassMark - G3D Mark 12794 19370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18169 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18169 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3290
Geekbench - OpenCL 68858 137262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2101.927
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name N19E-Q3 MAX-Q TU102
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 181 103
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $9,999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 - 1485 MHz 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 780 - 960 MHz 1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 2560
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready