NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1379 MHz
1414.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 115 Watt
Around 52% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 4887
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 550 vs 437
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12640 vs 9884
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 14915
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 14915

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz vs 1379 MHz
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2560 vs 2048
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt vs 115 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7438 vs 4887
PassMark - G2D Mark	550 vs 437
PassMark - G3D Mark	12640 vs 9884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529 vs 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529 vs 14915

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1110 MHz
4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3356
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1215 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8902 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8902 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8048 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8048 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

7438

4887

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

550

437

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12640

9884

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

14915

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

14915

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8902

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8902

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

8048

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

8048

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7438	4887
PassMark - G2D Mark	550	437
PassMark - G3D Mark	12640	9884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529	14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529	14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	8902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	8048
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	8048
Geekbench - OpenCL		37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		692.9

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU104	GP104
Launch date	27 May 2019	27 June 2017
Place in performance rating	171	221
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1379 MHz
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2048
Pixel fill rate	99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s	176.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	115 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	7,200 million
Floating-point performance		5,648 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	256.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)	8008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready