NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 1062.6x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 6008
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12291 vs 11485
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 17105
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 17105
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 vs 6008 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12291 vs 11485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 17105 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 535
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5581 vs 3715
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5581 vs 3715
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 vs 535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 6008 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 | 733 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12291 | 11485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 5581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 5581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3360 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 183 | 186 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 234.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 320.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
