Apple A14 Bionic vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of Apple A14 Bionic and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple A14 Bionic
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7440 vs 3714
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7440 vs 3714
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6721 vs 3359
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6721 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 Oct 2020 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- 576x more pipelines: 2304 vs 4
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 13095
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 13095
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 4 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 13095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 13095 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple A14 Bionic
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Apple A14 Bionic | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13095 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13095 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple A14 Bionic | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 23 Oct 2020 | 13 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 208 | 211 |
| Architecture | Turing | |
| Code name | TU104 | |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 654 GFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4 | 2304 |
| Render output units | 16 | 64 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
