NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 858.2x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 12984
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 13339
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 13339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 12984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3709 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 805 vs 705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 805 vs 705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 805 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 12984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3709 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71540 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 226 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
