NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 885 MHz
  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1185 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
  • Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 115 Watt
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 484
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 11756
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 17328
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 17328
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Pipelines 3072 vs 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 115 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 vs 484
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 vs 11756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 vs 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 vs 17328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3346
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3346
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3714
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3714
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8055 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8055 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
484
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
11756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
17328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
8055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
8912
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 484
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 11756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 8055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 8912
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 6838
Geekbench - OpenCL 78123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1001.496

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU106
Launch date 27 May 2019 29 January 2019
Place in performance rating 175 178
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1185 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 885 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 2304
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 10,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz