NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1159.5x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- Around 26% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2432
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 14686
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 16128
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 16128
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3638
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3638
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2432 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 14686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3638 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 705
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 14686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3638 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 6809 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51484 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 175 | 235 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |