AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 110 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3346 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 705 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1792
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 15257
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 15257
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 9522
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1792 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 15257 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 9522 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3346 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9522 | 14832 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 188 | 185 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 296.6 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 18.98 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
