NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16498 vs 10498
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 vs 601
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19800 vs 11029
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19800 vs 11029
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 August 2018 vs 8 August 2017
Core clock speed 1620 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Boost clock speed 1815 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 16498 vs 10498
PassMark - G2D Mark 785 vs 601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19800 vs 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19800 vs 11029

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG

  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3702
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3702
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7766 vs 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7766 vs 3702

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
16498
10498
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
785
601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19800
11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3702
7766
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19800
11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3702
7766
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 AMD Radeon Pro SSG
PassMark - G3D Mark 16498 10498
PassMark - G2D Mark 785 601
Geekbench - OpenCL 98317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19800 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3702 7766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19800 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3702 7766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3347
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 170.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3178.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 173.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1231.051

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 AMD Radeon Pro SSG

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 13 August 2018 8 August 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $2,299 $6,999
Place in performance rating 46 47
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1815 MHz 1500 MHz
Core clock speed 1620 MHz 1440 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt 350 Watt
Transistor count 13,600 million 12,500 million
Floating-point performance 12,288 gflops
Pipelines 4096
Texture fill rate 384.0 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 6x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 1890 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 Bit
Memory type HBM2