NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 723 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 3162
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 418
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 50809
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 6796
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 6796
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 2 October 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 vs 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 vs 50809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 6796 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD FirePro W7170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 50809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 2 October 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 112 | 420 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |