NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1645 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18544 vs 15451
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 vs 725
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 63932
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 194.277
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 1916.09
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 17.951
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 31.471
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 545.751

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1440 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 19571
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 19571
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 3503

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18544 15451
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	785 725
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74179 63932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488.989 194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5451.006 1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.461 17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.677 31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1534.582 545.751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19571 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3503 8770

Compare specifications (specs)