NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1645 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 55% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 9016 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18544 versus 15451
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 versus 725
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 63932
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 194.277
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 1916.09
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 17.951
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 versus 31.471
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 545.751
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 1 October 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1645 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 9016 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18544 versus 15451 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 versus 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 versus 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 versus 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 versus 19571
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 versus 19571
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 versus 3503
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 versus 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 versus 19571 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 versus 3503 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18544 | 15451 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 | 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3503 | 8770 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU102 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 1 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | $5,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 124 | 204 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $4,403.52 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 394.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 9016 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||

