NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 12633
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 515
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 11451
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 3555
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 vs 3198
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 11451
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 3555
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 vs 3198
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 21 June 2017 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 12633 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 vs 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1246 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166109 vs 136722
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1246 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166109 vs 136722 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 12633 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136722 | 166109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3198 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 103 | 209 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1246 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |