NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3586
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3586
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6702 vs 4809
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33657 vs 22421
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3586 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6702 vs 4809 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33657 vs 22421 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 437
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 437 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 585 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6702 | 4809 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33657 | 22421 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | Vega 12 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 371 | 368 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |