NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 175 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 17 October 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16170 vs 6598
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 421
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88130 vs 32981
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.062 vs 87.83
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 9009
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16170 vs 6598 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 vs 421 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 vs 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 vs 87.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 9009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6598 | 16170 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 88130 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 252.062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 391 | 140 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
