NVIDIA Quadro T1000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 3.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 175 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 17 October 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 175 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1395 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16112 versus 6494
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 404
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88096 versus 32981
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 versus 87.83
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 9009
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 9009
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1395 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 versus 6494 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 404 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 versus 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 versus 87.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 9009 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 16112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 88096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 251.703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 400 | 151 |
| Genre | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M365X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
