NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- 1179.7x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 4500
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 15667
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 71.86
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 6796
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 6796
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 vs 4500 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 71.86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 404
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 4500 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 71.86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 517 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
| Price now | $319.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

