NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1076 MHz
737.3x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 22896
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3316
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3316

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 6 February 2017
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 1076 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981 vs 22896
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6942 vs 6469
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 411
Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 87.83
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9009
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9009

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6942 vs 6469
PassMark - G2D Mark	631 vs 411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	113.416 vs 87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10251 vs 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10251 vs 9009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6469

6942

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

411

631

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

32981

22896

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.83

113.416

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

10251

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3316

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

10251

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3316

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
PassMark - G3D Mark	6469	6942
PassMark - G2D Mark	411	631
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981	22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83	113.416
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009	10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009	10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		417.823
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2958

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP106
Launch date	27 May 2019	6 February 2017
Place in performance rating	399	401
Type	Mobile Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$585
Price now		$429.99
Value for money (0-100)		19.44
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1480 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1076 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	768
Pixel fill rate	46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s	94.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		3,031 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		201 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	128 GB/s	140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5