NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• 737.3x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 22528
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1455 MHz
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6934 vs 6596
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 420
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 87.83
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9009
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6596 6934
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	420 644
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32981 22528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.83 113.416
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9009 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9009 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3316

Compare specifications (specs)